Construction Contracts in DMCC: Complete Guide

Most construction work in DMCC is not construction. It is fit-out: partitioning an office in a Jumeirah Lakes Towers tower, building out a retail unit, refitting a floor for a new tenant. Ground-up development happens in the free zone's newer plots, but for the overwhelming majority of DMCC member companies the "construction contract" is a short, mid-value works contract carried out inside somebody else's building, under a lease, subject to a community's rules. Contracts written for a major project handle that badly, and contracts written on the back of a quotation handle it worse.

The useful starting point is to recognise how constrained the work actually is. Three documents outside the building contract control it: the lease, the free zone's fit-out requirements, and the rules of the jointly owned building.

The approval chain

Fit-out works in DMCC require the free zone authority's approval before they begin. Drawings, method statements and the contractor's details are submitted, approval is issued, works are inspected and a completion sign-off follows. The authority also maintains registration requirements for the contractors permitted to carry out works in the zone, and using an unregistered contractor is a straightforward way to have a project stopped mid-way.

Alongside that, the building itself has an owners association or appointed management company with its own rules — access and lift bookings, permitted working hours, protection of common areas, waste removal, security deposits, and insurance requirements for anyone working on site. These are enforced by the building manager, not by the authority, and they are enforced practically, by refusing access.

Two contractual consequences follow. First, obtaining approvals should be an express obligation of a named party, with a stated consequence if the approval is refused or delayed. Second, the programme has to be written around the building's restrictions rather than an eight-hour working day: if noisy work is confined to evenings and weekends, a completion date assuming otherwise is fiction, and the delay claim that follows is entirely self-inflicted.

The lease usually matters more than the contract

A tenant carrying out fit-out is spending money improving an asset it does not own, under a lease that will end. Before signing the works contract, check what the lease says about alterations, about landlord consent, and above all about the condition in which the unit must be returned. A reinstatement obligation turns an improvement into a future liability, and it needs to be priced into the decision rather than met with surprise at the end of the term.

Where the landlord contributes to the cost, the mechanics of that contribution — what evidence is required, when it is paid, what happens if the works are not completed to specification — belong in writing. Verbal fit-out allowances are a persistent source of small, bitter disputes in JLT.

Payment, retention and defects on small works

Fit-out contracts are where the standard protections most often go missing. Worth insisting on, whatever the value:

• A payment schedule tied to defined stages of work rather than dates in a calendar.
• Retention held until the snagging list is cleared, with a stated release trigger.
• A defects liability period during which the contractor returns to fix its own work.
• Variations recorded in writing before the work is done. Fit-out is the kind of work where the client changes its mind in front of the joiner and the joiner carries on; the change and its price need to be recorded at the moment it is instructed, not reconstructed when the final account is argued.
• Evidence of the contractor's insurance, and confirmation that its licence covers the actual scope.
• Ownership of design and drawings, particularly where a designer and a contractor are separately engaged.

Nothing in UAE law will restart a stalled fit-out quickly. A contractor who leaves a half-partitioned office over an unpaid application cannot be sent back by any fast official process; the tenant is left with a unit it cannot occupy, a lease or a landlord's deadline it may have promised to meet, and a claim that will take considerably longer than the works would have. Everything useful at that moment has to be in the contract already — a stage the payment is genuinely tied to, a certification step, and a stated consequence for downing tools. On a project of this size the payment mechanism is the clause worth arguing about.

Where a dispute goes

DMCC is a Dubai free zone. It is not a common-law jurisdiction, it has no separate contract law, and it has no court of its own. A fit-out contract for a DMCC unit is governed by onshore UAE law, including the Civil Code provisions on contracts for work. The provision most often quoted at contractors — the post-handover liability that a builder and a supervising engineer carry, for a period the law fixes, where a defect goes to the safety or stability of the building — is seldom what an internal fit-out argument is about, since a partition and a ceiling grid are not the tower's structure. What decides these disputes is the ordinary law of the bargain: what was agreed, what was instructed, and what was certified.

For a contract of fit-out value the forum question deserves a moment's realism before it is answered. Arbitration under Federal Law No. 6 of 2018 as amended in 2023 is open to the parties, and so, if they say so in writing, is the DIFC Courts as an English-language common-law forum; neither choice changes the law that governs the works. But a tribunal's costs can approach the amount in dispute on a claim this size, and an elaborate mechanism nobody will actually invoke is worth less than a simple clause and a file that supports the claim.

Say nothing, and what the parties get is the Dubai courts, in Arabic, with the technical questions — quality of workmanship, the value of the variations, who caused the delay — sent to a court-appointed expert whose report will effectively decide the case. On a small internal works contract that is frequently the sensible answer, provided the approvals, instructions, photographs and sign-offs can be handed to that expert in a form he can follow.

Jointly owned property

Almost every DMCC unit sits within a jointly owned building, and Dubai's jointly owned property regime governs the division between the unit an owner controls and the common parts it does not. Works touching structure, facade, risers, or building systems are not within a tenant's or owner's unilateral gift, however clearly they appear on the approved drawings. Where a project needs to touch the common parts, consent from the owners association comes before the contractor mobilises, not after a stop-work notice.

That is the recurring shape of DMCC construction problems: not sophisticated contractual failure, but works started before someone with the power to stop them had agreed. Our real estate legal services team reviews the lease, the fit-out requirements and the works contract as one package, and our property dispute resolution team acts where works have been halted, abandoned or disputed on completion.

Schedule Your Consultation

Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should seek professional legal advice tailored to their specific circumstances before making any decisions or taking any action based on the content of this article.

Nour Attorneys Team