Family Law and Art Collectibles in UAE: Luxury Asset Valuation

A picture on a wall has no price. It has a price on the day it sells, and in between it has opinions – an insurance figure, an auction estimate, a dealer’s offer, a number the owner has in mind. Family proceedings cannot work with opinions. To divide an estate or a marital pot, someone has to put a figure against each item, and that is where collections cause trouble that shares and property do not.

The UAE has become a market for art and collectibles as well as a place where collectors live, which means UAE family courts now see paintings, sculpture, watches, jewellery and classic cars appearing on asset schedules. The federal personal status regime governs the division; separate civil provisions are available to non-Muslims in some emirates, and the couple’s nationality or a choice of law can affect which rules apply. None of those regimes contains a valuation manual for a collection. The work is evidential and procedural, and it is largely done before anyone reaches a hearing.

Agree the basis of value before anyone values anything

The same object honestly supports several different figures. Fair market value assumes a willing buyer and a willing seller with time to find each other. Replacement value, which is what an insurance schedule usually records, is what it would cost to buy an equivalent piece today, and it is normally the highest of the numbers. A forced-sale figure – what the work would fetch if it had to be sold quickly – is normally the lowest.

Disputes described as arguments about value are often arguments about basis. One side produces the insurance schedule, the other produces a dealer’s offer, and both are honest. Settle the basis, the valuation date and the currency in the instruction to the valuer, and a large part of the disagreement disappears before it is written down.

The same instruction should state whether the figure is gross or net of the costs of sale. Selling a work at auction involves commission, shipping, insurance and often restoration or framing, and a collection that looks equal to a property on paper is not equal once those costs are taken off one side and not the other.

Getting the collection listed, and keeping it in place

Full disclosure of assets is required of both parties. Art tests that requirement more than most assets do, because works are portable, often stored away from the home, and frequently held through a company, a gallery account or a storage facility rather than in a spouse’s own name.

A usable inventory is built from documents rather than from memory: insurance schedules and the underlying valuations, purchase invoices, auction house account statements, import and shipping paperwork, condition reports, exhibition loan agreements and photographs. Those records also answer the question that comes before value, which is who owns the piece. A work invoiced to a company, or bought jointly with a third party, is not simply a spouse’s asset because it hangs in the marital home.

Where there is a real risk that works will move, the order that preserves them matters more than the valuation that follows. An early application restraining sale, loan or export, coupled with an obligation to notify the location of every item, protects the exercise. Courts can draw conclusions from a party who fails to disclose, but conclusions do not bring back a painting that has left the country.

Related: our personal status and family practice advises on disclosure, asset preservation and division.

Attribution decides value more than anything else

The gap between a work “by” an artist and a work “attributed to” or “in the manner of” that artist is not a refinement, it is most of the money. Where authorship is contested, the valuation cannot sensibly proceed until the attribution question is answered, and answering it is a specialist exercise: inclusion in the recognised catalogue of the artist’s work, the view of the artist’s foundation or authentication committee where one exists, gallery and exhibition history, and, where the material justifies it, scientific examination of pigments, supports and signatures.

Provenance does a second job beyond attribution. A collection assembled over decades and moved across borders can contain items with gaps in their ownership history, and a gap is a risk to title as well as to price. It is better for that to surface during the family proceedings than after the works have been divided and one party tries to sell.

Choosing the valuer, and instructing them properly

UAE courts rely heavily on appointed experts, and the practical question for the parties is whether they put forward a single agreed valuer or each instruct their own. A single valuer, agreed between the parties or appointed by the court, tends to produce a figure both sides can live with and avoids the spectacle of two reports that differ by a multiple. Competing valuers are sometimes unavoidable where the collection spans categories no single specialist covers – a house with Old Masters, contemporary work, watches and antiquities may need several.

Whoever is instructed should be told what the report has to contain: identification of each item with photographs, the basis and date of value, the comparable sales relied on, condition, provenance summary, and an express statement of assumptions and limitations. A valuation that gives a number and no reasoning cannot be tested, and a report that cannot be tested tends not to survive the hearing.

Condition, custody and the works themselves

Physical condition moves value, and condition changes while proceedings run. Works stored badly deteriorate; restoration carried out without agreement can reduce value rather than improve it; a piece on loan to an exhibition abroad is harder to bring into the division than one in a warehouse down the road.

The practical points are unglamorous and worth insisting on. Confirm who holds each item and where. Confirm the insurance is in force, in whose name, and on what figure. Photograph and condition-report everything at the start, so that damage arising later can be located in time. Agree that no restoration, loan or relocation happens without written consent. These arrangements sit better in an interim agreement than in a contested application later.

Dealing with it before there is a dispute

Collectors are unusually well placed to settle the treatment of their collection in advance, because the works are identifiable and can be listed. A marriage contract or a settlement can name specific items as separate property, record which were acquired during the marriage, set out an agreed mechanism for valuing them – a named valuer, or a valuer appointed by an agreed auction house – and give one party the option to take a work at that value rather than forcing a sale that neither wants.

Wills do similar work on the succession side. Directing whether a collection is to be kept together, sold, or passed to named beneficiaries removes the argument that otherwise runs alongside grief, and appointing someone with the competence to handle the works is as important as naming who receives them.

Related: we prepare marriage contracts, settlements and asset schedules through our contract drafting practice.

Where the parties would rather keep the detail of a collection out of open proceedings, a confidential process can be agreed. Mediation, or arbitration on the financial issues where it is available to them, allows the valuation evidence to be heard by someone who understands the market and keeps the inventory out of general circulation, which for many collectors is worth as much as the outcome.

Related: our dispute resolution team advises on mediation and arbitration options.

An order is not delivery

Dividing shares is a set of entries. Dividing a collection is a removal job. Once terms are agreed or ordered, someone has to arrange packing, transport and insurance in transit, deal with export and import formalities where works sit outside the country, update the insurance schedules on both sides, and hand over the paperwork – invoices, certificates, condition reports, provenance files – that the receiving party will need when they eventually sell.

None of that happens by itself. A term reading “the wife shall retain the contemporary works” leaves every one of those steps unallocated, and the works sit where they are while the parties work out who is supposed to move them. The detail that closes the matter is dull: each item against its inventory number, a named party responsible for packing, shipping and insuring it and for paying those costs, a collection date, and a stated consequence if the works are not collected by then.

Where the effort pays

Almost everything that goes wrong with art in a family case traces back to the first month: no inventory, no preservation order, no agreement on the basis of value, and an attribution nobody checked. Each of those is cheap to fix at the start and expensive to fix once positions have been taken and reports have been filed.

Take the inventory early, fix the basis of value before instructing anyone, resolve attribution before arguing about price, keep the works still and insured while the case runs, and settle the movement of each item – who packs it, who pays for it, and by when it is collected – before signing.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Additional Resources

Explore more of our insights on related topics:

• Dividing luxury assets in high-net-worth UAE cases
• Cryptocurrency and digital asset division
• Offshore trusts and asset protection
• Valuing a business in a family case