Corporate Governance UAE ESG Reporting Under Sustainability Framework

Boards must translate the UAE's sustainability ambitions into concrete ESG disclosures that comply with the UAE Sustainability Reporting Standards issued under Federal Decree-Law No. 26 of 2022 on Commercial Companies, the governing legal framework in the United Arab Emirates.

Related Services: Explore our Corporate Governance Advisory and Corporate Governance Framework services for practical legal support in this area.

HOW SHOULD A BOARD DEFINE MATERIALITY FOR ESG REPORTING UNDER THE UAE FRAMEWORK?

Materiality is the foundation of any credible ESG report. The board must first determine which sustainability issues could materially affect the company's ability to create long-term value. This process starts with a structured stakeholder-engagement plan that captures perspectives from investors, employees, regulators, suppliers, local communities, and civil-society groups. Surveys, focus groups, and one-on-one interviews should be designed to align with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) principles of stakeholder inclusiveness and materiality, while also reflecting sector-specific guidance issued by the Ministry of Economy and the Securities and Commodities Authority (SCA).

Once input is gathered, the board oversees the creation of a materiality matrix that plots each topic along two axes: significance to stakeholders and potential impact on the business. The matrix should be quantitative where possible-using scores derived from survey results-and qualitative where data are scarce, with clear documentation of assumptions, sources, and validation steps. The board must approve the final matrix and ensure it is revisited at least annually, or sooner when major operational changes, regulatory updates, or shifts in stakeholder expectations occur.

Embedding the approved materiality topics into the enterprise risk-management framework is the next step. The board should require that each material ESG issue be linked to existing risk categories (e.g., operational, reputational, regulatory) and that key risk indicators (KRIs) be established. Targets for performance measurement-such as carbon-intensity reduction, water-use efficiency, or board-gender diversity-must be SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-bound) and integrated into the company's strategic plan. Finally, the board must retain all documentation of the materiality assessment, including raw survey data, workshop facilitation notes, and the rationale for any topic exclusions, for a minimum of five years to satisfy audit and regulatory inspection requirements under the UAE Commercial Companies Law.

WHAT STEPS ARE NEEDED TO OBTAIN SUSTAINABILITY ASSURANCE THAT MEETS UAE STANDARDS?

Assurance provides the credibility checkpoint that transforms internal ESG data into trustworthy disclosures. Under the UAE Sustainability Reporting Standards, assurance follows the International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 (Assurance Engagements Other Than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information). The board's role begins with the selection of an independent assurance provider that possesses expertise in both sustainability reporting and the specific industry context of the company. Independence must be verified through conflict-of-interest declarations, and the provider's credentials should be checked against recognized accreditation bodies such as the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) or the UAE's own Accountancy and Auditing Organization.

Once appointed, the board and the provider must co-create an assurance charter that delineates the scope (e.g., limited vs. reasonable assurance), the reporting boundaries (legal entities, geographic coverage, supply-chain inclusions), the criteria against which the data will be evaluated (UAE Sustainability Reporting Standards, GRI, SASB, or sector-specific frameworks), timelines, and deliverables. The charter should also specify the provider's access rights to underlying data systems, the methodology for testing data reliability (e.g., substantive testing, analytical procedures, walkthroughs), and the format of the assurance statement.

During the assurance engagement, the board should receive regular progress updates-ideally monthly-to identify any gaps early, such as missing data sources or inconsistent calculation methods. This proactive monitoring allows the board to request remedial actions before the final assurance statement is issued. Upon completion, the provider must deliver a formal assurance opinion that concludes whether the ESG information is free from material misstatement and complies with the disclosure requirements. The board must review this statement, ensure it is attached to the published sustainability report, and archive the engagement letter, work-papers, and the assurance opinion for at least five years, as mandated by the UAE Commercial Companies Law for audit evidence.

Cost considerations are inevitable; however, the board must balance fee reasonableness with the need for high-quality assurance. A competitive tender process, clear fee structures, and benchmarking against market rates for similar engagements requires avoiding overruns while preserving independence.

HOW CAN THE BOARD OVERSEE ESG REPORTING EFFECTIVELY THROUGH GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES?

Effective oversight transforms ESG reporting from a compliance task into a strategic lever. The board should first amend its terms of reference (ToR) to explicitly include ESG as a standing agenda item, ensuring that every board meeting allocates time for ESG updates, risk discussions, and performance reviews. Minutes must reflect decisions on materiality, assurance, target setting, and any corrective actions, providing an auditable trail of board diligence.

Many companies benefit from establishing a dedicated ESG committee composed of independent directors with expertise in sustainability, finance, risk management, or relevant industry sectors. This committee can draft ESG policies, review draft disclosures before board approval, challenge assumptions, and recommend enhancements based on emerging trends or regulatory developments. The committee's charter should outline its reporting lines to the full board, frequency of meetings (quarterly is common), and the authority to request external advice or training.

In lieu of a separate committee, some boards appoint a lead director for ESG who acts as the point-of-contact between management, the assurance provider, and the board. This lead director receives quarterly key performance indicator (KPI) packs-covering metrics such as greenhouse-gas emissions, energy consumption, waste diversion, social-impact indicators, and governance scores-and performs variance analysis against targets and prior periods. The lead director also flags emerging sustainability risks (e.g., new climate-related regulations, supply-chain ESG controversies) and ensures they are escalated to the full board for strategic consideration.

Training is another critical oversight tool. Directors should undergo regular upskilling on the UAE Sustainability Reporting Standards, international frameworks (GRI, SASB, TCFD), and evolving ESG litigation trends. Workshops led by external experts or internal sustainability officers provides directors the ability to ask informed questions and exercise prudent judgment.

Linking ESG performance to executive remuneration reinforces accountability. The board can set a portion of variable pay-such as annual bonuses or long-term incentive plans-contingent on achieving predefined ESG targets. Clear accountability lines, where specific executives own individual ESG KPIs, ensure that sustainability objectives are not siloed but integrated into overall business performance.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What legal framework governs ESG reporting in the UAE?
The mandatory disclosure criteria are set out in the UAE Sustainability Reporting Standards, issued by the Ministry of Economy under Federal Decree-Law No. 26 of 2022 on Commercial Companies. For entities listed on the Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange or Dubai Financial Market, the Securities and Commodities Authority Board Decision No. 3 of 2023 concerning Sustainability Disclosures imposes additional assurance and reporting obligations. The Arabic version of any UAE legislation published in the Official Gazette prevails over translations.

Is external assurance required for all ESG reports?
Assurance is compulsory for public joint-stock companies listed on the UAE's two main exchanges, as stipulated by SCA Decision No. 3/2023. Private companies may elect to obtain voluntary assurance to boost credibility with investors, lenders, or commercial partners, but it is not legally mandated unless they fall under specific sectoral regulations (e.g., banking, insurance).

How often must materiality assessments be updated?
Best practice-and the expectation of regulators-is to review the materiality matrix at least once per fiscal year. However, the board should trigger an ad-hoc review when there are material changes in operations (e.g., mergers, acquisitions, divestments), new regulatory requirements (such as updates to the UAE Climate Law), or significant shifts in stakeholder sentiment (e.g., heightened investor focus on biodiversity).

What documents should the board retain for audit purposes?
To satisfy the evidentiary requirements of the UAE Commercial Companies Law and any external audits, the board must preserve: stakeholder-engagement raw data and summaries, the final materiality matrix with rationale, assurance engagement letters, the provider's work-papers and assurance statement, board meeting minutes and committee reports concerning ESG, and any policies or procedures adopted to implement ESG oversight. Retention period is a minimum of five years from the date of the report's issuance.

Can ESG performance influence director liability?
Yes. Under Article 164 of Federal Decree-Law No. 32 of 2021 on Commercial Companies, directors who fail to exercise reasonable oversight-including neglecting to verify the accuracy of ESG disclosures or ignoring material ESG risks-may be held liable for breach of fiduciary duty. Civil penalties can include compensation for losses suffered by the company or its shareholders, and in severe cases, regulatory sanctions or disqualification from directorship.

Note: The firm's standard wording will be added after this article.

If your matter involves corporate governance advisory in the United Arab Emirates, you are welcome to request a consultation with Nour Attorneys. Our team can assess your position under the law currently in force and outline the options available to you. Request a consultation

This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading this article or contacting Nour Attorneys through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship; such a relationship arises only after a conflicts-of-interest check and a signed engagement agreement. Do not send confidential information through this website; information submitted before engagement is not protected by legal privilege. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. The firm's lawyers practice in the jurisdictions stated in their individual profiles; this article addresses the law of the United Arab Emirates only.